欢迎访问陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版)官方网站!
三支决策专题

基于不完备信息系统的三支冲突分析

  • 杨文听 ,
  • 易黄建 ,
  • 陈跃 ,
  • 李小南
展开
  • 1 西安电子科技大学 数学与统计学院,陕西 西安 710126;
    2 西北大学 信息科学与技术学院,陕西 西安 710127

收稿日期: 2021-04-25

  网络出版日期: 2022-05-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(61772019, 61906154)

Three-way conflict analysis based on incomplete information systems

  • YANG Wenting ,
  • YI Huangjian ,
  • CHEN Yue ,
  • LI Xiaonan
Expand
  • 1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, Shaanxi, China;
    2 School of Information Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, Shaanxi, China

Received date: 2021-04-25

  Online published: 2022-05-10

摘要

将Pawlak的冲突分析模型推广到不完备的信息系统中,并结合三支决策思想研究了不完备信息系统上的三支冲突分析。首先,对缺失的值进行了处理,把不完备的信息系统转化为完备的信息系统。其次,通过冲突相似距离这一概念,讨论了代理之间的冲突关系,从而建立了不完备信息系统中的冲突分析模型。最后,根据决策理论粗糙集求解了模型中代理三划分所需阈值的大小,从而得到最为合理的三划分决策结果。

本文引用格式

杨文听 , 易黄建 , 陈跃 , 李小南 . 基于不完备信息系统的三支冲突分析[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022 , 50(3) : 43 -51 . DOI: 10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2022106

Abstract

The Pawlak's conflict analysis model is generalized to the incomplete information systems, three-way conflict analysis based on incomplete information systems is studied with the thought of three-way decision. Firstly, the missing value are processed and the incomplete information systems are transformed into the complete information systems. Secondly, the conflict relationship of agents is discussed, and the conflict analysis model in incomplete information systems is established by the concept of conflict similarity distance. Finally, the threshold of the tri-partition of the agents is computed by the decision-theoretic rough sets, so as to get the most reasonable tri-partition decision result.

参考文献

[1] YAO Y Y. Probabilistic approaches to rough sets[J]. Expert Systems, 2003, 20(5):287-297.
[2] YAO Y Y. Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2009, 180 (3):341-353.
[3] YAO Y Y, WONG S K M, LINGRAS P A.Decision-theoretic rough set model[J]. Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, 1991, 5:17-24.
[4] MANDAL P, PEMADIVE A S. Decision-theoretic rough set under Pythagorean fuzzy information[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2018, 33:818-835.
[5] LIU D, LI T R, LIANG D C. Three-way government decision analysis with decision-theoretic rough sets[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012, 20 (1):119-132.
[6] 张文修,吴伟志,梁吉业,等.粗糙集理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社, 2001.
ZHANG W X, WU W Z, LIANG J Y, et al. Rough sets theory and method[M].Beijing:Science Press, 2001.
[7] 李小南,祁建军,孙秉珍,等.三支决策理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社, 2019.
LI X N, QI J Y, SUN B Z, et al. Three-way decision theory and method[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019.
[8] HU B Q, WONG H, YIU K F C. On two novel types of three-way decisions in three-way decision spaces[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2017, 82:285-306.
[9] SUN B Z, MA W M, XIAO X. Three-way group decision making based on multigranulationfuzzy decision-theoretic rough set over two universes[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2017, 81:87-102.
[10] LI X N, SUN Q Q, CHEN H M, et al. Three-way decision on two universes[J]. Information Sciences, 2020, 515:263-279.
[11] LI X N, WANG X, SUN B Z, et al. Three-way decision on information tables[J]. Information Sciences, 2021, 545:25-43.
[12] PAWLAK Z. An inquiry into anatomy of conflicts[J]. Information Sciences, 1998, 109(1): 65-78.
[13] PAWLAK Z. Some remarks on conflict analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 166(3):649-654.
[14] DEJA Z. Conflict analysis[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2002, 17:235-253.
[15] HU B Q. Three-way decisions space and three-way decision[J]. Information Science, 2014, 281:21-52.
[16] LIANG D C, XU Z S, LIU D. Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets with dual hesitant fuzzy information[J]. Information Sciences, 2017, 396: 127-143.
[17] LANG G M, MIAO D Q, CAI M J. Three-way decision approaches to conflict analysis using decision-theoretic rough set theory[J]. Information Sciences, 2017, 406:185-207.
[18] SUN B Z, MA W M, ZHAO H Y. Rough set-based conflict analysis model and method over two universes[J]. Information Sciences, 2016, 372:111-125.
[19] FAN Y, QI J J, WEI L. A conflict analysis model based on three-way decisions[C]//Proceeding of the 2018 International Joint Conference.Quy Nhon, Vietnam:IJCRS, 2018: 522-532.
[20] YAO Y Y. Three-way conflict analysis: reformulations and extensions of the Pawlak model[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2019, 180:26-37.
[21] LANG G M, MIAO D Q, FUJITA H. Three-way group conflict analysis based on Pythagorean fuzzy set theory[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 28(3):447-461.
[22] SUN B Z, CHEN X T, ZHANG L Y, et al. Three-way decision making approach to conflict analysis and resolution using probabilistic rough set over two universes[J]. Information Sciences, 2020, 507:809-822.
[23] LI X N, WANG X, LANG G M, et al. Conflict analysis based on three-way decision for triangular fuzzy information systems[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2021, 132:88-106.
[24] BASHIR Z, MAHNAZ S, MALIK M. Conflict resolution using game theory and rough sets[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2021, 36:237-259.
[25] KRYSZKIEWICZ M. Rough set approach to incomplete information systems[J]. Information Sciences, 1998, 112(1):39-49.
[26] LIU D, LIANG D C, WANG C. A novel three-way decision model based on incomplete information system[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 91:32-45.
[27] LUO J F, HU M J, QIN K Y. Three-way decision with incomplete information based on similarity and satisfiability[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2020, 120:151-183.
文章导航

/